![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, Torchwood. Kind of... icky, wasn't it? I think I get the story might be about corruption now. But Gwen is a useless POV character (and I'll never forgive her for what she's doing to Barry Backstory; although I think Burn wotsisname is giving the best performance in the show). I think if I was about fifteen, I might think this was the best TV programme I had ever seen. As it is - well, it's better than Robin Hood. But nowhere near as good as Strictly Come Dancing.
Hey, though! They're showing Crown Court on Legal TV!
Hey, though! They're showing Crown Court on Legal TV!
no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 09:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 09:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 09:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 07:44 pm (UTC)(Me, I'm enjoying the series, but not as much as I'd expected to, so I'm still hoping it'll get better as it goes along.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 09:23 am (UTC)I thought the best performance was by the doctor who was in Bleak House?
no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 11:03 am (UTC)The doctor who was in Bleak House is Burn Wotsisname, and it's by far the best performance - John Barrowman has been very disappointing. Mr A. reckins it's because he's doing theatre acting and projecting to the back.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 09:25 am (UTC)At 20, I think it's occasionally brilliant but always very funny. (The tractor rescue!)
no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 11:06 am (UTC)My reading is that Gwen has been the POV character from the start: we entered Torchwood with her, she is the only one whose outside life we follow in any detail, and we are seeing her get further into the mire.
I was a bit bored by the time of the tractor rescue, but last night's had one laugh out loud moment, where Owen shouted out something like, "Only in the &£*%$ countryside!" Also, I love bad puns so I liked the title.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-21 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 09:27 am (UTC)So much for the gritty adult take, eh?
The trailer looked good, it's disappointing to see all these poor reviews. (Mind you, I don't mind a bit of ickiness, if, like nudity, it's all about The Integrity of the Story, and if they're finally getting into the corruption angle, good, but that's all so easily undermined if the characters are poor and things feel gratuitous.)
no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 11:10 am (UTC)I thought last night's was perfectly well executed, it just didn't float my boat. Owen's characterization and performance were actually very good. Everthing else - meh. Love your icon.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 10:28 am (UTC)Owen was the only interesting bit, though I'm puzzled. They spent two episodes establishing that he was a nasty bit of work, and last night he's got the Tarrant-style "We've got to rescue the rest of our team" role. So are we supposed to think he's been un-corrupted by meeting Gareth Thomas? Or by his feelings for Gwen? Or he's putting on a show to get Gwen into bed? Or that The Same Person Can Be Nasty and Nice Depending On The Circumstances?
no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 12:05 pm (UTC)I didn't see the very end of last night's - the scene where a naked Owen told a half-dressed Gwen "you can now" was just too vomit inducing. I don't suppose I missed much.
And I decided on seeing the first two episodes that they had done the sadly all too common thing of confusing "adult" with "smutty adolescent".
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 10:31 pm (UTC)I don't think there's necessarily any conflict between being a nasty bit of work and being loyal to a group (see football hooligans, soldiers who commit atrocities, etc). Did we see Owen displaying a 'run away and abandon the rest' attitude before? As far as I can recall, he's always pretty much on side and ready to get into the action.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 01:32 pm (UTC)Today's version would be 'text 0898 xxx xxxx to decide the verdict. Texts cost £2.50 or more from a landline.'
no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 03:41 pm (UTC)"Who should be sent down? You decide."
no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 02:51 pm (UTC)Crown Court - fantastic ! I grew up on that, you know.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-21 04:02 pm (UTC)(BTW, the DVDs have arrived safe and sound, and I hope you had a chance to watch them.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 03:35 pm (UTC)This week's reaction posts to / summaries of the Welsh cannibal hillbillies don't really make me regret this decision. Hasn't anyone in Wales seen The Texas Chainsaw Massacre yet? Or at least a few X-Files episodes?
Actually, from what I've heard about it, Countrycide does remind me a bit of the X-Files stories Our Town and Home -- which I, aged 15, actually considered to be among the best things ever, so your observations re: Torchwood might be justified.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-21 12:32 pm (UTC)If only I had done that. I may have to friend you on the strength of this alone.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 06:39 pm (UTC)I think Burn Gorman is quite good, but I've been more pleased overall with Gareth David-Lloyd, who made the equally cliche-ridden "Cyberwoman" bearable; the rest of the cast is forgettable.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-21 04:12 pm (UTC)I really hope not, but I'm kind of afraid it might be true. The thing is it's not done with any irony: the characters should be saying things like: "I can't believe we're in The Texas Chainsaw Massacre!" or "When does the Scooby Doo van turn up?"... but they don't. Which you can't quite get away with, post-Buffy.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-20 09:22 pm (UTC)And the ending with Gwen and Owen-the-date-rapist was urgh. Poor Rhys (Reece?) - he deserved better.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-21 04:00 pm (UTC)My God, this is completely true. And, taking into account the next comment, it is indeed Five Go To Royston Vasey. Oh, how my head hurts!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Special Stuff
Date: 2006-11-21 08:47 am (UTC)Re: Special Stuff
Date: 2006-11-21 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-23 09:18 am (UTC)Would you call two of your central characters such similar-looking names as Owen and Gwen?
Tosh is obviously meant to fancy Owen. As if. I can't stop seeing as her Saffy's best mate in Absolutely Fabulous. They nearly all act as if they're in an episode of Hollyoaks.
Still enjoyed the Welsh cannibals though. Creepy. Much creepier than aliens. That's where "Jeepers Creepers" went wrong, IMHO. Once you realised the baddie wasn't human, he wasn't nearly as scary. Agree with the posters about those two X-Files episodes being some of the best TV ever (Mulder's line - upon discovering that suspect X had produced suspect Y by having sex with his own mother - "you mean he could ground his brother when he stole his toys?"). Also like "Humbug", despite the comparative lack of inbreeding plotline.
Finally say the first four eps of Boston Legal. I love it. "Denny Crane." Is it just me, or is James Spader actually really sexy?
no subject
Date: 2006-11-29 01:26 pm (UTC)What did you think of this week's episode? I thought it was the strongest yet - the first time that the plot of the week and the characters seemed to be in alignment. Owen'n'Gwen become rapidly less and less attractive figures (if that was possibly with Owen).
Finally say the first four eps of Boston Legal. I love it. "Denny Crane."
I knew you'd like it, it's just brilliant.
Is it just me, or is James Spader actually really sexy?
He is sexy, but in such a way that you can't quite believe you're finding him sexy. IMHO. I can't stop watching him on-screen, even when Shatner is standing next to him and trying to steal the scene.