This piece in today's Guardian, The way of the PhDiva, seems to me to be (unintentionally? Help, I can't tell!) hilarious. Opening sentence: "I have been near Cannes for the film festival and reading Vanity Fair."
Hmm: "I nipped round to Tescos for a cornish pasty and have been reading Georgette Heyer."
I seem to be having tremendous difficulty with my lifestyle...
Hmm: "I nipped round to Tescos for a cornish pasty and have been reading Georgette Heyer."
I seem to be having tremendous difficulty with my lifestyle...
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 05:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 05:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 06:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 09:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 06:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 06:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 10:22 am (UTC)I have to admit that I found the article less funny than enraging.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 10:36 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 05:59 am (UTC)I'm pretty sure that this is just the perfect LJ post because it does encapsulate everything.
I seem to be having tremendous difficulty with my lifestyle...
I hope you ran a sweep for freak wormholes before typing that statement.
And as for the article, I saw that too and got Charlene's 'Never Been To Me' as an earworm.
I hope you enjoyed your pasty.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 06:34 am (UTC)Oops...
And as for the article, I saw that too and got Charlene's 'Never Been To Me' as an earworm.
LOL, perfect!
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 06:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 06:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 06:44 am (UTC)Excellent summing-up of the problem, I'd say.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 07:21 am (UTC)As an Anglicised American, I also find it difficult to understand Prof Estrich's all-out attack, as represented in various articles. You catch more flies with honey than with vinegar, so I take a different approach to life.
That's male hegemony right there, enshrined in an admittedly rather feeble brain and twisting it into a little hairball of unacknowledged self-hatred. Good grief.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 07:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 08:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 10:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 08:07 am (UTC)In your Manolo Blahniks, I trust.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 08:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 10:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 08:12 am (UTC)But you're a glamorous doctorate-holder!
WTF is the point of that 'article'? I remain confused as to whether it was flies, vinegar, Ted Kennedy, or cervical cancer.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 08:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 08:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-27 03:27 am (UTC)Possibly from this fine academic institution.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 08:50 am (UTC)As you do.... That woman is insufferable! Plus she then went and schmoozed the gin-sodden old lecher, instead of finding someone interesting to talk to (mind you, they wouldn't, would they, if they were interesting?)
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 09:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 11:35 am (UTC)I seem to be having tremendous difficulty with my lifestyle...
Tell me about it. But it's okay. Item: I'm still listening to Prince covers. Or should those be Songs Formerly By The Artist Formerly Known As Prince.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-27 03:31 am (UTC)Love it.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 11:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 11:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-27 03:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-27 04:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-27 04:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 02:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 02:01 pm (UTC)Also, I don't think the author is all that familiar with "Professor Estritch", or Michael Kinsley, or their relationship. Susan is not just some obscure professor of law. She is one of the major back room leaders of the Democratic Party, and was the boss of Fritz Mondale's Presidential Campaign in 1984. She lost, but Bill Clinton with Jesus as his manager would have lost to Reagan in 84. She deserves high marks for taking on a hopeless task, and giving it her all.
Kinsley was the host of Crossfire for many years. Crossfire is the original US raving loony political confrontation show. I think they bolt the chairs to the floor so the guests and hosts won't hit each other over the head with them, and don't allow sharp objects on the set. Susan was a regular guest, and occasional guest host. She is a regular on similar shows to this day. She made the rounds yesterday discussing the filibuster deal. That she writes Kinsley nasty letters, and then publishes the exchange is typical for the crowd she operates in. Wacking people over the head with an oar to start the debate is just one of the things that makes Susan Estritch so loveable, and why she gets invited on those shows.
I am sure the advice is well intentioned, but Susan is one of those people who could call the White House and get to talk to the President, so I am not sure if she needs a whole lot of advice on how to succeed in her chosen field at this point.
I may not have a PhD in anything, but I do know enough not to advise senior British politicians on how to conduct themselves, given that I don't even know who the major players are.
I love the Ted Kennedy bit. Of course Ted was nice to her. Ted is always nice to good looking young women. Years ago, I worked in a law office as their computer expert. There was a young woman lawyer there who was quite attractive. She told me a story that while she was in college, she visited Washington one summer. She and a friend took a tour of the Senate office building. They somehow ended up in Teddy's office, and the secretary ushered them right in to meet the Senator. Teddy apologized that he couldn't invite them out to dinner, but he had things to do that evening, offered them free tickets to plays or concerts while they were in Washington, which they declined. She said she felt uncomnfortable, like this guy old enough to be her grandfather was hitting on them both. No kidding? Teddy?
mk
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 02:55 pm (UTC)And, oh, to be a fly on the wall for that conversation...
("I'm sorry, Mr President, I don't *have* any smaller words to use.")
no subject
Date: 2005-05-27 06:04 am (UTC)I do know enough not to advise senior British politicians on how to conduct themselves
Our very own George Galloway does not have such scruples!
no subject
Date: 2005-05-27 06:43 am (UTC)I just read her Bio. It was the Dukakis campaign in 88, another guaranteed loser. I should never rely on my memory.
Galloway was great theater. The Senate needs to have a few "Guests" who don't bow and and scrape, if just to see the shocked looks on the esteemed gentlemen's faces. As ususal, there were those who cheered, and others who jeered. US politics is more like a football riot than real debate these days. He fit right in. He would make a great host on Crossfire if he loses his seat.
mk
no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-26 11:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-27 07:56 am (UTC)[cheerfully] I have, every week - I read the Weekly Guardian, which doesn't annoy me very often because they mostly only keep the news in, and then the Saturday Guardian, which sends me into paroxysms of rage every Saturday. But this was quite extraordinary. I think my favourite bit, apart from the stuff everyone else has mentioned, was where the whole article was her slagging off other women ("If this is the sisterhood, I want to be a man", the Estrich-bashing, etc) on the grounds that she was more supportive to other women than they were. Head spinning now.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-27 08:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-05-30 02:26 am (UTC)We wear Manolo Blahniks but we also have doctorates
*sprays screen with tea*
Let's see:
we wear Birkenstocks but we also have MBAs
we eat mice but we also have MScs
we wear Florence and Fred but we also have GCSEs
But what was the point of the article?? Just to make people feel jealous and a tiny bit confused??
What a very strange article.
Personally, i'm a Ph.Dork, but hey.
no subject
Date: 2005-05-31 02:32 am (UTC)we eat mice but we also have MScs
we wear Florence and Fred but we also have GCSEs
:-D It's like one of those irregular verbs, isn't it?
But what was the point of the article?? Just to make people feel jealous and a tiny bit confused??
Also to make its author feel better about herself, I think.