Joined-up government
Jun. 16th, 2004 09:55 amI'm researching and writing up a section on e-government for TBT, and two out of every three links on the subject that I click on around the government sites are dead, or lead to a wrong page.
There's a link in chapter 5 of the White Paper Modernizing Government which should go to a consultation document (Our Information Age) but which just goes to the front page of the 10 Downing Street website. Which is a nice touch.
There's a link in chapter 5 of the White Paper Modernizing Government which should go to a consultation document (Our Information Age) but which just goes to the front page of the 10 Downing Street website. Which is a nice touch.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 02:24 am (UTC)http://www.dti.gov.uk/infoage/infoage.htm
I wrote our organisations e-gov strategy (actually several versions over the past few years). My feeling was that expectation was low. I recommended to the DfES that they create a standard template and guidance for the strategies, to speed up the process and ensure all the main aspects were covered, however they seemed to find it hard to engage with the process in an active way.
My personal feeling was that writing the strategy did nothing to promote e-government; but that if it was the requirement to produce one, I wanted to do it in a dynamic and positive way.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 02:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 02:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 03:03 am (UTC)Another nice touch, on the day that the Modernisation Select Committee is talking about making Parliament more accessible (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3809949.stm), is that the www.parliament.uk server appears to be off the network.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 03:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 03:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 03:58 am (UTC)I direct my honourable friend's attention to TheyWorkForYou, a nice, usable interface to Hansard with a comments facility for sad political hacks. (Which reminds me, I must get round to posting something to it.)
no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 04:01 am (UTC)I love their revamped version of the National Rail Timetable; they're right - the official version is execrable.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 05:34 am (UTC)honourable
Oy, watch it. You'll give me a bad name.
no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 06:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-16 08:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-06-17 01:52 am (UTC)Comparative governance
Date: 2004-06-16 10:34 pm (UTC)When I was young and foolish, I applied for a number of jobs as a government computer geek. I had excellent grades, and high marks on the official government pre-hiring test. When I went to job interviews, they never asked about anything having to do with working on computers. All the questions were of the brainwashing variety, such as; "Tell us about your worst personality traits.". Being stupid, I answered truthfully with gems like, "I have limited patience for stupid questions, and the people who ask them." Needless to say, I was never hired. I suspect this is typical of how governments everywhere select their staff.
Mike K
Re: Comparative governance
Date: 2004-06-17 12:59 am (UTC)*snort!*
Hm, more coffee on the monitor...
"I have limited patience for stupid questions, and the people who ask them." Needless to say, I was never hired. I suspect this is typical of how governments everywhere select their staff.
LOL! Well, look on it this way - the environment would probably have driven you insane.