![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
The friends planning to visit us had to cancel at the last minute, which left us with a clean house and an unanticipated empty evening. We used it semi-profitably watching The Bourne Identity and then the end of the Sly remake of Get Carter which ends with Sly killing Michael Caine, saying a fond farewell to the daughter, and driving off into the sunset. Abominably wrong.
In town on Saturday I had book binged, picking up (on 3 for 2) Life of Pi (my reading group's next choice; anticipating ambivalently), The Lovely Bones (recced by
kathyh; anticipating greatly), and Eats, Shoots and Leaves (quick read, enjoyable enough). Also Le Guin's new book about planes, and Guy Kay's Sailing to Sarantium. Welcome to the pile. At the moment I'm reading a bunch of crime books by David Peace, set in Yorkshire during the 1970s - pretty bloody brutal and depressing, to be honest; Get Carter is invoked in one of the reviews on the blurb.
In town on Saturday I had book binged, picking up (on 3 for 2) Life of Pi (my reading group's next choice; anticipating ambivalently), The Lovely Bones (recced by
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2004-03-14 01:24 pm (UTC)the end of the Sly remake of Get Carter which ends with Sly killing Michael Caine, saying a fond farewell to the daughter, and driving off into the sunset.
Nooooooo!
{weeps}
no subject
Date: 2004-03-14 01:26 pm (UTC){weeps}
That was our opinion too.
On the plus side...
Date: 2004-03-14 01:35 pm (UTC)Re: On the plus side...
Date: 2004-03-14 01:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-14 01:52 pm (UTC)I think a mutual RL friend has been recommending The Lovely Bones, as well. Hope you enjoy it.
I read a few snippets of Eats, Shoots and Leaves in Borders, but I couldn't work up enough enthusiasm at the time to buy it. Is it worthwhile? I do like a collection of her weekly columns from a few years ago, called Making the Cat Laugh.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-14 01:59 pm (UTC)I imagine you would share her wrath, but to be honest it's pretty slight. Borrow my copy - it'll take you a Sunday afternoon to read.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-14 02:10 pm (UTC)Thanks, A. I'll take you up on that. So long as you don't mind if the Sunday afternoon in question takes a while to come round. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2004-03-14 02:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-14 02:19 pm (UTC)I used to make it a policy never to rec books, but since I've been on LJ that seems to have changed. Hope you enjoy it (though I'm not sure enjoy is quite the right word).
and Guy Kay's Sailing to Sarantium.
That gets a recommendation as well.
At the moment I'm reading a bunch of crime books by David Peace, set in Yorkshire during the 1970s - pretty bloody brutal and depressing, to be honest;
I don't know those. The DH is a big Reginald Hill fan. Is there any similarity apart from the Yorkshire setting?
no subject
Date: 2004-03-14 02:58 pm (UTC)I used to make it a policy never to rec books, but since I've been on LJ that seems to have changed. Hope you enjoy it (though I'm not sure enjoy is quite the right word).
I used not to rec books much either, understand your concern! I was interested in what you had written about it on your LJ, and it gave me an excuse to do a 3 for 2 at Borders. I plan to start it tonight, although I gather it's something of a page-turner.
I'm reading a bunch of crime books by David Peace, set in Yorkshire
I don't know those. The DH is a big Reginald Hill fan. Is there any similarity apart from the Yorkshire setting?
I haven't read Reginald Hill, but these books are brutal, violent, and absolutely not for the squeamish or the faint at heart. It's a quartet about corruption and perversion of justice in the north of England throughout the 70s and early 80s (as reflected in the titles: Nineteen Seventy Four, Nineteen Seventy Seven, Nineteen Eighty, Nineteen Eighty Three).
As I say, it's a quartet and I'm only half way through, so I'll reserve comments on whether or not they work until I've read the last two. But they are by no means pleasant to read. Bent coppers doesn't even begin to cover it.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-14 03:13 pm (UTC)I certainly thought so. I think I read it almost *too* quickly.
these books are brutal, violent, and absolutely not for the squeamish or the faint at heart.
Thanks for the warning. They sound more the DH's sort of thing than mine, though not much like Reginald Hill.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-14 03:16 pm (UTC)I'm a shocking skim-reader, I must try to slow down on this one a bit.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-15 06:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-15 07:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-15 01:54 am (UTC)That gets a recommendation as well.
Do you know if the follow-up is out in ordinary paperback yet? It's on Amazon, but wasn't in Borders, and I don't want to have the trade paperback annoyance again.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-15 02:56 am (UTC)Yup. "Lord of Emperors" has been out in ordinary paperback a while, which is probably why Borders hasn't got it any longer. A new book of his has just come out in America but I don't think it's been published here yet. I'm going to have to resist the trade paperback (hate the things) over that one!
no subject
Date: 2004-03-15 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-15 03:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-15 03:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-15 03:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-15 07:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-14 04:48 pm (UTC)Oh, I don't know. I saw a print of the Mona Lisa with a scrawled-on Groucho Marx moustache, and I thought it was a vast improvement over the po-faced original.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-15 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-15 02:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-15 02:37 am (UTC)That must have been in teeny tiny writing. The Mona Lisa is not a very big picture.
death by biro
Date: 2004-03-15 06:18 am (UTC)Re: death by biro
Date: 2004-03-15 07:35 am (UTC)OT
Date: 2004-03-15 12:49 pm (UTC)Re: OT
Date: 2004-03-15 01:34 pm (UTC)