Strictly narrative
Feb. 3rd, 2004 11:09 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Turning away from difficult issues, I'm internally debating the ethics of going to see Sylvia. It's hard not to take into account what Frieda Hughes has written:
"Now they want to make a film
For anyone lacking the ability
To imagine the body, head in oven
Orphaning children."
***
I really enjoy my offline reading group, but we decided at the outset not to read classics, in which I am woefully under-read. There should be a reading group for people hastily trying to fill the gaps in their reading. A sort of mutual support group in response to that game in that David Lodge novel, where all the English Lit academics admit to the most gaping hole in their reading.
***
And, thirdly:

"Now they want to make a film
For anyone lacking the ability
To imagine the body, head in oven
Orphaning children."
***
I really enjoy my offline reading group, but we decided at the outset not to read classics, in which I am woefully under-read. There should be a reading group for people hastily trying to fill the gaps in their reading. A sort of mutual support group in response to that game in that David Lodge novel, where all the English Lit academics admit to the most gaping hole in their reading.
***
And, thirdly:

Re:
Date: 2004-02-03 05:50 pm (UTC)So that's what Denethor used...
Re: reading - I dropped English lit at 16 and kind of regret it. And I bullshit wildly about things I haven't read (but have read other people's opinions of!).
Re:
Date: 2004-02-03 06:23 pm (UTC)I'd really love a list of all the excellent books that I've never read (which would be a really long one) and a few months off to read them all. With intermittend trips to the pub for a rest, of course. Unfortunately, my definition of excellent also includes the pre-requisite that I enjoy the books as well as admiring the writing, and it's much harder to get someone to create a list with that particular requirement in mind!
Re:
Date: 2004-02-04 10:02 am (UTC)You are who I think you are, aren't you? :-D *adds you to friends list*
Re:
Date: 2004-02-11 03:26 am (UTC)I don't know if I am who you think I am - tricky to say! I probably am though ;-)
One day we really will go punting on the Cam so I can find out if I can do the jumping out of the boat and running over the top of the bridge trick!
Re:
Date: 2004-02-11 10:39 am (UTC)One day we really will go punting on the Cam so I can find out if I can do the jumping out of the boat and running over the top of the bridge trick!
:-D Yes, you are who I think you are!
My South Park piccie isn't as nice as yours.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-16 05:55 pm (UTC)If you know who I am you won't be surpised to learn I got lost again yesterday. On Coldham's lane. How can anyone get lost on Coldham's lane? I don't know. It's not like I don't drive down it at least twice a month.
Speaking of which, I'd love to pop in and catch up with you and "Mr Altariel" some time. There aren't enough hours in the day to catch up over email!
Re:
Date: 2004-02-16 06:28 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-17 07:37 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-17 08:14 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-20 04:04 am (UTC)