Reading Ulysses with Bishop Brennan
Jul. 13th, 2011 11:07 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I decided that this would be the year that I would read Ulysses. I've made two attempts on it before, but stalled a little before 200 pages in (my edition is 700 pages long): so, after Lestrygonians.
This time round I've got myself an audio reading to help me through. It's an unabridged reading from Naxos Audio, read by Jim Norton and Marcella Riordan. (You will perhaps know Jim Norton as Bishop Brennan from Father Ted.)
Anyway, this has definitely been the way to go. I started a couple of days before Bloomsday, and after a month I'm halfway through. I've not been worrying myself too much about chasing up all the references, but have used these summaries to give me some guidance at the start of each chapter. This time I found the text on Gutenberg (probably naughty, it doesn't come out of copyright until the end of the year), and have been reading on my Kindle. The text doesn't have references, which has speeded up the process somewhat. I imagine it's very easy to get lost in the various schemata. I don't mind missing everything as long as I'm getting the gist. Either it works as a novel with some characters in it or else it doesn't.
I am happy to report that it does. Damn, though, it's funny. Jim Norton is great. The characters spring to life, and the complete bewilderment you have when reading cold as to focalization is circumvented by him voicing it for you. The episode I just read/heard, Cyclops, is a case in point: the (unnamed) narrator had a very distinctive down-to-earth Dublin voice, and all the ancillary characters have their own voices. Then all the tangents (and long lists) are given in a different, brisk tone (making them very funny). Best of all, we hear Bloom's speaking voice (we have hitherto heard Bloom primarily via stream of consciousness as warm, humane, rather sad) as someone else hears it... whereupon he becomes prissy, argumentative and rather annoying.
There's no way I could have done all that myself. As a result, I'm cracking through, and it's become completely accessible. So if you ever thought you might give it a go, this could be one way in.
This time round I've got myself an audio reading to help me through. It's an unabridged reading from Naxos Audio, read by Jim Norton and Marcella Riordan. (You will perhaps know Jim Norton as Bishop Brennan from Father Ted.)
Anyway, this has definitely been the way to go. I started a couple of days before Bloomsday, and after a month I'm halfway through. I've not been worrying myself too much about chasing up all the references, but have used these summaries to give me some guidance at the start of each chapter. This time I found the text on Gutenberg (probably naughty, it doesn't come out of copyright until the end of the year), and have been reading on my Kindle. The text doesn't have references, which has speeded up the process somewhat. I imagine it's very easy to get lost in the various schemata. I don't mind missing everything as long as I'm getting the gist. Either it works as a novel with some characters in it or else it doesn't.
I am happy to report that it does. Damn, though, it's funny. Jim Norton is great. The characters spring to life, and the complete bewilderment you have when reading cold as to focalization is circumvented by him voicing it for you. The episode I just read/heard, Cyclops, is a case in point: the (unnamed) narrator had a very distinctive down-to-earth Dublin voice, and all the ancillary characters have their own voices. Then all the tangents (and long lists) are given in a different, brisk tone (making them very funny). Best of all, we hear Bloom's speaking voice (we have hitherto heard Bloom primarily via stream of consciousness as warm, humane, rather sad) as someone else hears it... whereupon he becomes prissy, argumentative and rather annoying.
There's no way I could have done all that myself. As a result, I'm cracking through, and it's become completely accessible. So if you ever thought you might give it a go, this could be one way in.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 10:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 10:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 10:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 10:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 10:45 am (UTC)The audio book sounds like a way round that, yes :)
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 10:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 11:13 am (UTC)I love Ulysses and go back to different sections, but I haven't reread the entire thing since A-levels (yup, some of us are loony enough to have done Joyce as our set author).
Finnegan's Wake is, however, too terrifying a prospect.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 12:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 11:42 am (UTC)Brilliant! Thanks for the link!
no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 11:43 am (UTC)Jim Norton and Marcella Riordan have apparently also recorded an abridged version of Finnegan's Wake, if you're tempted...
no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 09:19 pm (UTC)The Finnegan's Wake adaptation sounds interesting, too.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 09:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 12:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 08:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 12:15 pm (UTC)I can personally verify that it is an interesting experience. I do, however, remember very little of the actual book...
no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 09:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 03:06 pm (UTC)And for once my default icon is the correct one.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 09:04 am (UTC)I only have TS Eliot icons for the occasion, alas.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 03:22 pm (UTC)Maybe I should have tried this method during my EngLit degree. After plodding through A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, I shied away from tackling Ulysses (although one of my favourite lecturers was a wonderful Joyce fangirl - and I am using this word on purpose). But this sounds actually entertaining - and far less intimidating than the freaking big book of references that our library helpfully provided and which was thrice as thick as the novel itself!
(Generally speaking, all my six years at uni were like one round of David Lodge's Humiliation Game after the other. :D)
no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 04:01 pm (UTC)I would win/lose every round of the Humiliation Game, I think!
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 03:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 09:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 10:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 10:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 06:54 pm (UTC)I might do this if I can ever bring myself to re-read.
*mutters darkly about having to read it in the first week of the first term of her first year as an undergraduate*
no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 09:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 10:01 am (UTC)My edition lacked notes because I was trying to be very careful with my grant, and not overspend, and I'd noticed that there was a cheap Penguin edition and an expensive Penguin edition (the library copies had all disappeared in about 30 seconds). So I bought the cheap Penguin edition because I hadn't noticed the expensive one had notes.
And then I got terribly depressed about being stupid in the seminar because everyone else had the edition with notes and was therefore saying what sounded like lots of insightful things to little, terrified undergraduate me who was relying on her own brain and not sure how to read to that level in a week after spending two years on six books for A levels. It wasn't until much later that I realised that all these seerius intelekshuls were just cribbing from the notes in their editions. I am pretty sure I was the only person in the room who had a full grant, incidentally.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 03:50 pm (UTC)Dreadful show-offs.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 10:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-13 10:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-14 09:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-15 05:57 am (UTC)IIRC back in the day me and some other dudes hypothesized that Kant's Critique of Pure Reason devolves into graphic pornography after page 200 cos beyond that no-one had ever read and so could disprove it. Perhaps if read out loud its characters might spring to life?
Or you know perhaps not.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-15 08:14 am (UTC)It's true! The slash sequences with Hegel start on p. 224.