"Does the Future of SF Lie in Media other than Traditional Literature?" was the title of a panel I spoke on at NewCon, alongside Paul Cornell, John Jarrold, Steve Longworth, and Dave Hutchinson.
owlfish assures me that I was witty, erudite, and profoundly insightful but, given that poor acoustics meant she had only heard one word in ten, I thought I'd disprove that by putting up my preparation notes.
Not all of this came up, and plenty of other interesting points were raised too, particularly surrounding the user-friendliness or otherwise of eBook readers, and the failure of the Doctor Who webisodes to catch on.
None of the following came up, IIRC, but I include it for completeness' sake:
Not all of this came up, and plenty of other interesting points were raised too, particularly surrounding the user-friendliness or otherwise of eBook readers, and the failure of the Doctor Who webisodes to catch on.
- My background is in fanfiction; an interesting set of communities to look at in this context because without the commercial constraints of mainstream publishing, they are able to take more risks in terms of format.
- It’s fair to say that the paper fanfic zine is dead. The fanfiction has all gone online. Why not? Cheaper to produce, you get more rapid responses, and it serves wonderfully the desire for community that is a big reason that people participate in fandom. So the paper fanzine is dead, and has been for at least five, possibly going on for ten years.
- So when I hear people talk about the demise of the SF short story magazine, I wonder if something similar is happening: again, there are tight margins, comparatively small audience, impatience with the slow turnaround on response (if any) when you can have the immediacy that comes from online (particularly now we’ve all had a taste of that).
- But certainly not the death of the SF short story form – there’s more short fiction out there than anyone could possibly consume! If I did wake up one morning and decide that what I needed in my life was more Stargate: Atlantis, I could spend months catching up on the fiction. I assume a similar proliferation of online venues for original fiction has been happening?
- Even more than online zines, this is where the shift to podcasting is very interesting. Short fiction and the podcast seem made for each other: 30 minutes to an hour, ideal for a commute or for escape from the misery of the exercise bike. As well as there being podcasts putting out short fiction (e.g. EscapePod, PodCastle), there are podcasts with the old fanzine content of discussion and interviews (e.g. StarShipSofa).
- And this struck me as being almost a return to the roots of SF: poking around iTunes, I found the British Science Fiction Podcast, which puts out 50s radio classics like Journey Into Space. This is great for several reasons: not just the nostalgia value for people who remember the broadcasts the first time round, but the opportunity for people who weren’t born to have access to classic material. Like when we were all of a sudden empowered to come up with our opinions on ‘The Tomb of the Cybermen’.
- So for the future of the short story as a form, and for the audio fanzine – the podcast – I’m very positive. That’s seen a revival. For the paper format, less so.
- Except for the book. About which I’m very positive, because as archive technologies go, it’s been pretty successful compared to Betamax or the CD. Why? I think people like the physical artefact. But also, I think that we’re afraid of the ephemerality of the net, particularly communities like ours which are conscious of tradition.
None of the following came up, IIRC, but I include it for completeness' sake:
- Another potential huge change is in the composition of audiences: there’s so much to consume now, that we can’t consume it all, and that might mean greater fragmentation of audience: if people feel their taste isn’t well represented in long-established venues, they’ll go off and create their own venues.
- And to disprove my own final point and show you can’t predict the future, I’ll note that Doctor Who has done exactly the opposite, and reconstructed a large general audience that most industry experts said was dead. However.. has it done this for SF? It’s fantasy and action-adventure, rather than SF, that has been made as a result: Merlin, Robin Hood, Primeval.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 04:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 05:20 pm (UTC)I think there's a small minority who just prefer to read stuff on paper.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 05:59 pm (UTC)I think one could make a good case that fanfic has been around for so long (hundreds of years) that it is a branch of "traditional literature". (Whatever that is. I appreciate that the term wasn't yours, but did anyone try to define it? If one's going to discuss a topic, it's useful to have a consensus as to just what it covers.)
BBC 7 has been broadcasting some old SF radio series, including "Journey into Space". (And is available onlide on the BBC website via "Listan Again".)
Arguably "Doctor Who" itself is fantasy/action-adventure rather than SF.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 07:08 pm (UTC)Arguably "Doctor Who" itself is fantasy/action-adventure rather than SF.
I absolutely agree, to the extent that I don't think you need the 'arguably' there.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 07:30 pm (UTC)Ah, so fanfic was viwed as being part of traditional literature? I had the impression from your original post that perhaps it wasn't so viewed,
no subject
Date: 2008-10-18 09:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 07:07 pm (UTC)I totally agree about radio being more fun when you can carry it around with you. That's the big difference from before, I suppose - the timeshifting, and what that means for audience and appointment listening/viewing. I was never able to find time to listen to radio before.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-16 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-18 09:40 am (UTC)Totally! I remember a few years back (um, possibly as much as a decade?) someone started publishing short stories in pamphlet form for sale at railway stations: you could fold them round on themselves really easily so that they were compact, and they had a disposable feel about them. But an online service dispenses with all that mucking about of having to handle paper and queue up to pay and so on.
ETA: Also, without all the production costs of printing, there's a chance someone might make some money out of such a venture - or, at least, not lose money.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-20 04:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-20 05:39 pm (UTC)Seriously, I do have terrible recall for panels, thanks to getting so nervous - I wouldn't be able to tell you what I'd said if I hadn't had these notes. The major line of discussion that I can recall was about whether the eBook would or could takeover from the paper book.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-22 10:22 pm (UTC)