I liked it. I discussed it a bit with archbish on my journal but all spoilered out. You might find it a bit umm... unsubtle, psychologically, but I liked it because it exteriorised emotion into sensual details like rain and blood.
I hope it'll be on next week - I actually *get paid*!! in a few days (yes, like a proper real person with a job!!!) which is better, I think, that having a whole ten pence to rub together, which is what it's been like since the research grant ran out.
Wow, cinema, shopping, what treats next week has in store!
no subject
Date: 2003-06-25 02:30 pm (UTC)BTW 'my' Cusack was Lane somebody or other I never heard of, who is apparently obsessional and wierd. As if.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-25 02:39 pm (UTC)Not yet - is it worth it?
BTW 'my' Cusack was Lane somebody or other I never heard of, who is apparently obsessional and wierd. As if.
Can't see it myself.
no subject
Date: 2003-06-25 03:32 pm (UTC)I liked it. I discussed it a bit with archbish on my journal but all spoilered out. You might find it a bit umm... unsubtle, psychologically, but I liked it because it exteriorised emotion into sensual details like rain and blood.
Re:
Date: 2003-06-26 12:19 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-06-26 02:18 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-06-27 08:40 am (UTC)Wow, cinema, shopping, what treats next week has in store!
no subject
Date: 2003-06-27 11:56 am (UTC)Yay! Let me know if you fancy seeing anything...
Re:
Date: 2003-06-27 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-28 01:22 am (UTC)As for 'The Matrix Reloaded', I thought you were nearly as anti as Mr A.? I did see it, but would see it again, if you wanted to.
Re:
Date: 2003-06-28 02:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-06-28 11:35 am (UTC)Yes, but the wrong sort ;-)
JC it is, then!
Re:
Date: 2003-06-28 04:19 pm (UTC)