The wee small hours
Nov. 15th, 2007 12:25 pmWaking up early, I'm still processing the previous day, so that meant I woke up frothing about the Great Leader's proposed new security measures for big railway stations. I'd pretty much decided - after the year's experiences at Gatwick - that air travel is simply too much faff these days (not to mention the ethics of it). But now rail as well? Is the idea to make everyone stay at home? Or sit in traffic? Certainly that way it'll be easier to keep track of us all.
There's also something about combining police and intelligence functions that in some way troubles me, simple sociologist that I am, but then I woke up completely and I couldn't follow my own train of thought any longer. Am I crazy? Am I dreaming?
GDR (as in grinning, ducking, and running too)
Date: 2007-11-15 12:47 pm (UTC)Re: GDR (as in grinning, ducking, and running too)
Date: 2007-11-15 12:50 pm (UTC)On the blessed names of Gordon Ramsay and Heston Blumenthal, take that back, madam!
Re: GDR (as in grinning, ducking, and running too)
Date: 2007-11-15 01:02 pm (UTC)Re: GDR (as in grinning, ducking, and running too)
Date: 2007-11-15 01:03 pm (UTC)Re: GDR (as in grinning, ducking, and running too)
Date: 2007-11-15 01:29 pm (UTC)"Get your f****** bike off the pavement, sonny."
Re: GDR (as in grinning, ducking, and running too)
Date: 2007-11-15 03:04 pm (UTC)Re: GDR (as in grinning, ducking, and running too)
Date: 2007-11-15 03:12 pm (UTC)Re: GDR (as in grinning, ducking, and running too)
Date: 2007-11-15 03:14 pm (UTC)Re: GDR (as in grinning, ducking, and running too)
Date: 2007-11-15 03:22 pm (UTC)Thank God.
Re: GDR (as in grinning, ducking, and running too)
Date: 2007-11-16 04:36 pm (UTC)Re: GDR (as in grinning, ducking, and running too)
Date: 2007-11-15 07:47 pm (UTC)And what did they invent? The cuckoo clock!
Date: 2007-11-16 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 01:02 pm (UTC)I'm still - not frothing, but terrified and in shock - about Samina Malik being convicted of writing poetry. (Am I missing something here? I haven't seen any reports on this case that suggest she did anything other than download a bunch of Muslim extremist literature and write down a bunch of violent fantasies. I just... it's such a Niemoller moment for me, because really, at this rate, it's not long before they'll be coming for me.)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 06:09 pm (UTC)I think it also pulls the security services further to the centre of the policing of our society, rather than keeping it on the edge where it should more properly be. Normalizing its presence. But I need to do more reading on this subject.
I hope the judge in the Samina Malik case has the good sense to impose a token sentence. I'm glad nobody went rootling around the alienation fantasies I was producing in my early twenties.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 10:00 pm (UTC)There's a good example from the run-up to the Iraq war. While everyone was arguing abut intelligence reports on weapons of mass destruction (and please don't get me started on that phrase), a Cambridge researcher published an analysis based only on information in the public domain with the conclusion that Iraq had no significant stockpiles of chemical weapons, and certainly no biological or nuclear weapons.
That's not to say covert intelligence gathering is worthless. But it is vital to have a firm understanding of the sources of error, and to always remain open to alternative interpretations. There are powerful psychological factors, such as confirmation bias, that can lead us into all kinds of fallacies, and this is nowhere more in evidence than in the realm of covert intelligence.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 09:42 am (UTC)Goodness, yes. I felt that bad literary biography, having perpetuated the error that poems can be read uncritcally as autobiography, and that the 'I' in a poem is the same as the 'I' of the author, deserves some of the blame for that. E.g. Ronald Hayman read Sylvia Plath's 'Edge' as evidence that the writer planned to kill her children. Using it as evidence in court is only one step further...
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 02:53 pm (UTC)Hope that waking early hasn't thrown you off-balance for today.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 05:52 pm (UTC)It didn't throw me off-balance, thanks :-) I had quite an early night, and I think I may well have simply had enough sleep. (If such a thing is possible.)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 04:07 pm (UTC)Today's New York Times has a deadpan little item "Airport Screeners Missed Explosives, Report Says" about GAO investigators who, using information from the Internet* built an incendiary device and smuggled liquid explosives and detonators through security. The report "described an episode on March 23, when a security screener would not let one investigator through a checkpoint with a small unalbeled bottle of shampoo, even though it was a legitimate carry-on item. But the same investigator was able to bring through a liquid component of a bomb that would start a fire."
A RL counterpart of the scene in Dave Barry's novel "Big Trouble" where Russian terrorists were able to smuggle an atom bomb onto a plane because of the security guard's fixation on having the hapless hero re-start his laptop over and over.
*Which rather compromises the risk that they could have blown up the plane if they'd wanted to
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 05:54 pm (UTC)I always get pulled out and frisked, I must have a threatening kind of face.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 01:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 01:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 07:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 02:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 02:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 07:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 06:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 10:06 pm (UTC):-)
xxx
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 11:30 pm (UTC)COME HOME! *flails* This Week is No Good without you.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 01:32 am (UTC)M
xxx
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 11:16 pm (UTC)Naturally, because of the security systems.
Actually, whacky as this all is, what bothers me most is that this applies to big stations. Um, what about the others? As David Gunsen says, it's hard to hide airports, but there are considerably more stations.
If you're not going to secure the whole link, why even bother?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 11:29 pm (UTC)Loving that icon.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 03:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 07:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-17 03:36 am (UTC)SanityTerror until our governments can declare victory in the War on Photography!(Am I the only person who thinks that from now on, anyone running for elected office should be asked how many adult diapers they wet each day? The sheer level of wussiness we're seeing in Our Brave and Fearless Leaders has got to be unprecedented. They're frightened of their own shadows!)
no subject
Date: 2007-11-17 09:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 08:35 pm (UTC)And I tell you, if this country goes much further to the dogs I might well go and join Jo Walton in Canada. It makes me shiver to think where we'll be in fifty years' time.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-18 04:28 am (UTC)Maybe because it's the operational method of choice in all the most fashionable totalitarian dictatorships?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-18 09:28 am (UTC)