altariel: (Default)
[personal profile] altariel
Inspired by this post by [livejournal.com profile] aervir, I'm wondering which former companion you're gunning for: Captain Jack Harkness? Or Sarah-Jane Smith?

[Poll #843762]

Date: 2006-10-13 10:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hafren.livejournal.com
Depends entirely on which is burdened with the greater freight of RD's Mary Sueishness....

Date: 2006-10-13 03:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] altariel.livejournal.com
Surely we all have a little Sarah-Jane in us!

Date: 2006-10-13 05:50 pm (UTC)
ext_6322: (Dr Troughton)
From: [identity profile] kalypso-v.livejournal.com
I hope not!

Date: 2006-10-13 11:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aervir.livejournal.com
My answer is clearly biased by my rooting for a decent kids' show with SJS.

Date: 2006-10-13 03:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] altariel.livejournal.com
As opposed to K9 and Company? ;-D

Date: 2006-10-13 04:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aervir.livejournal.com
I know it only from hear-say, but yes, indeed.

Date: 2006-10-13 12:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redstarrobot.livejournal.com
I think Torchwood has greater potential, but will likely also be easier to screw up. The Sarah-Jane Adventures seem a bit more idiot-proof, but also less ambitious.

Date: 2006-10-13 03:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] altariel.livejournal.com
I wonder if they can do Torchwood on the budget it's likely to have. I shouldn't be so grumpy, Ultraviolet was smashing after all.

Date: 2006-10-13 03:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redstarrobot.livejournal.com
I think it's a valid concern, given RTD's comment about how all the Earth-bound episodes were the result of being unable to do alien planets on their budget. Well, okay, but somehow every other BBC SF series has managed it on a fraction of that budget. So it seems to be artificially limiting how high they set their sights.

Date: 2006-10-13 04:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] communicator.livejournal.com
I like Sarah-Jane more as a character, but I think Torchwood probably has more protential.

Date: 2006-10-13 10:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redstarrobot.livejournal.com
The Sarah Jane adventures are sort of a sure bet. You have a proven actress, a proven character, a premise that demands to be formulaic because of the intended audience. But they're a sure bet because they're not trying to be anything new. Torchwood is being more ambitious, but is unproven characters and a premise that demands a departure from formula - from a lot of applicable formulas, in fact - and it remains to be seen if it can deliver. So Sarah Jane can't miss being the happy medium, but Torchwood will either sink or swim.

Date: 2006-10-13 06:24 pm (UTC)
manna: (Default)
From: [personal profile] manna
I think it could go either way, but I think SJA has a narrower bellcurve, while Torchwood is more likely be really, really good, or really, really awful.

Date: 2006-10-14 01:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] altariel.livejournal.com
*prays it's not Robin Hood style suckage*

Date: 2006-10-13 06:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jhall1.livejournal.com
Which is going to be better?

It's impossible to say. The premise for a series counts for much less than how well it is execured.

Date: 2006-10-13 07:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katlinel.livejournal.com
I'm feeling gloomy after Robin Hood, so I think that Sarah-Jane might win out. Oh yes, and seeing a Torchwood advert on the side of a double decker bus added to my gloom, as they had Jack in action pose, brandishing a pistol. And if they're trying to sell him as an action hero, they are missing the point. If he had been brandishing a banana, I would be more hopeful.

Date: 2006-10-14 01:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] altariel.livejournal.com
Because bananas are good.

Date: 2006-10-13 07:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katlinel.livejournal.com
And I really enjoyed Maid Marian and Her Merry Men, which was a kids show. Of course, I was watching when I was off sick from university with glandular fever, so its merits may just have been a fever dream. But anyway, I'm holding out hope for Sarah-Jane.

Hmm, I need a Sarah-Jane icon.

Date: 2006-10-14 02:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] altariel.livejournal.com
I need a Sarah-Jane icon too. But it needs to be the right one for her.

I only saw bits of Maid Marion, but what I saw was great.

Date: 2006-10-13 10:19 pm (UTC)
kerravonsen: 9th Doctor, silvery-grey: "Oh no!" (Doc9-oh-no)
From: [personal profile] kerravonsen
Well, at least we know that both John Barrowman and Elizabeth Sladen can act, which is more than can be said for the leads in other Sci-Fantasy shows (Angel, The Pretender...)

I am so put out with RTD, that I'm inclined to say that the one which will be better will be the one that he has less to do with, or at least, writes fewer episodes for.

Date: 2006-10-14 02:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] altariel.livejournal.com
I think after Robin Hood I'm trying not to raise my hopes to high for Torchwood so that when it's great it'll be a pleasant surprise.

Date: 2006-10-14 12:23 am (UTC)
ext_50187: (Default)
From: [identity profile] jomacmouse.livejournal.com
which former companion you're gunning for: Captain Jack Harkness? Or Sarah-Jane Smith?

We're not talking about actual guns here? If so, Harkness. Bang bang. If not, pity...

In the spirit in which the question was actually put, Sarah Jane. S'got to be...

Date: 2006-10-14 01:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] altariel.livejournal.com
Poor Cap'n Jack!

Profile

altariel: (Default)
altariel

September 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 24th, 2025 10:55 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios