Rise of the Cybermen
May. 16th, 2006 05:33 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I didn't post anything about 'Rise of the Cybermen'. So I will.
selenak has already said the vaguely interesting things I had to say: is Mickey the 'spare part' for the chop (thanks to D. for calling this a "Metal Mickey" theory, LOL!), will the Doctor meet the alternate Time Lords? (I wondered whether they had pulled TARDIS pulled into the alternate universe.)
Altogether, quite a straightforward Doctor Who adventure. Very like 'Aliens of London' only, er, not crap. I wasn't particularly wowed by Graeme Harper's direction, which was a bit of a letdown, at least not in the way that Joe Ahearne's episodes do splendid things to my head, although 'The Lion Sleeps Tonight' bit was superb. And the new Cybermen look just fabulous; all those dance lessons definitely paid off (but which one was Jonathan Ross?!).
I'm a big fan of Jackie and Rose, but I got the strong feeling in this episode that their story was coming to its conclusion, or that it would need a real change of emphasis to keep me interested much longer. WTF is Roger Lloyd Pack taking? "My dreeeeeammms of conquest...!" ect. ect.
So, a mixed bag - didn't have the wow factor I was hoping for, but Cyber-beauty and a splendid gothic pop moment. Next episode, I want HORROR. And more spinning blades.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Altogether, quite a straightforward Doctor Who adventure. Very like 'Aliens of London' only, er, not crap. I wasn't particularly wowed by Graeme Harper's direction, which was a bit of a letdown, at least not in the way that Joe Ahearne's episodes do splendid things to my head, although 'The Lion Sleeps Tonight' bit was superb. And the new Cybermen look just fabulous; all those dance lessons definitely paid off (but which one was Jonathan Ross?!).
I'm a big fan of Jackie and Rose, but I got the strong feeling in this episode that their story was coming to its conclusion, or that it would need a real change of emphasis to keep me interested much longer. WTF is Roger Lloyd Pack taking? "My dreeeeeammms of conquest...!" ect. ect.
So, a mixed bag - didn't have the wow factor I was hoping for, but Cyber-beauty and a splendid gothic pop moment. Next episode, I want HORROR. And more spinning blades.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 05:39 pm (UTC)Personally I'd have gone for Happy Days are Here Again, but that's just because Adric was sooooooooo irritating ...
no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 06:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 11:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-17 06:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-17 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 06:12 pm (UTC)Steady on. You'll be demanding monkey bars next.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 06:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 08:01 pm (UTC)Let there be horror, spinning blades, monkey bars and all. How about some thumping pistons for good measure?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-17 06:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 08:18 pm (UTC)I really don't hope so. I'm all for Ricky getting killed off and Mickey staying behind to take care of his Gran. He's become such a great guy by now, and I certainly wouldn't want to see him dead.
WTF is Roger Lloyd Pack taking? "My dreeeeeammms of conquest...!" ect. ect.
Heh. My thoughts exactly. But I did like the "from beyond the grrraaave" line in the teaser. It's so bad that it's already good again.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-17 07:01 am (UTC)One of Mr A.'s colleagues nearly switched off at "from beyond the graaaaave". But stayed (well, what else would you watch on a Saturday night?!). And enjoyed the rest.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-17 01:27 pm (UTC)What? But that's the best line ever! And one which I have been quoting to a highly annoying extent, as
no subject
Date: 2006-05-17 02:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-17 02:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-17 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-16 10:53 pm (UTC)Next episode, I want HORROR. And more spinning blades.
Yes!
Think we'll have more Lion King references?
no subject
Date: 2006-05-17 06:33 am (UTC)They'll have to tell me if there are more Lion King references, I've never seen it!