Greatest Philosopher Poll
Jul. 8th, 2005 09:34 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
In Our Time is running a poll to discover who the nation (or, at least, the section that listens to Radio 4) thinks is the Greatest Philosopher Ever. Julian Baggini put a persuasive case for David Hume, but I voted for John Stuart Mill, because some stupid people recently said he was harmful, and also because so far as I know he was the only one on the list to write about women. Also, half a pint of shandy would make me feel ill too.
Re: O Immanuel Kant was a real pissant who was very rarely stable
Date: 2005-07-08 08:08 am (UTC)On the minus side for Kant: unreadable.
Re: O Immanuel Kant was a real pissant who was very rarely stable
Date: 2005-07-08 08:37 am (UTC)"I saw that courageous and bright minds have gained mastery of my Critique despite its thorny paths... These worthy men have that happy combination of thorough insight with a talent for lucid exposition (the very talent that I am not aware of in myself)..." (2nd edition Preface, Critique of Pure Reason).
I always admire Kant for admitting up front what others transform into a philosophical issue, with greater or lesser justificaction.
Dwim
Re: O Immanuel Kant was a real pissant who was very rarely stable
Date: 2005-07-08 08:39 am (UTC)Re: O Immanuel Kant was a real pissant who was very rarely stable
Date: 2005-07-08 08:44 am (UTC)Re: O Immanuel Kant was a real pissant who was very rarely stable
Date: 2005-07-08 09:12 am (UTC)