I think thinking is so important
Jun. 2nd, 2005 02:13 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
The idea of a harmful book is meaningless to me, although I imagine that if I dropped a hardback of Das Kapital on my toe it would probably hurt a fair old bit.
Whilst it didn't make the top ten, two or more of the judges listed On Liberty by John Stuart Mill as a harmful book. Ah, but then Mill knew all about this "peculiar evil", didn't he?:
"If all mankind minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind. [...] [T]he peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error." (On Liberty, chapter 2).
I'm particularly grateful that a list of these miserably misnamed "scholars" is provided at the end of this article so that I can
Re: I'm shocked
Date: 2005-06-03 11:02 am (UTC)But since it is an ideological list, the other omission that caught my eye as I read over the top ten was that the judges barely see fit to mention racism as a dangerous idea. They mention the mass-murder of Jews under "Mein Kampf", but as a topic, anti-semitism isn't brought up, nor is any other form of racism. None of the books listed in the top ten, with the exception of "Mein Kampf", readily lend themselves to analysis in terms of racialized politics. It's as if that concept had no part in the horrors of the past two centuries. To me, that's rather telling.
Dwim