No discussion with the word "sexiest" in it can possibly be stupid. "Sexiest NT" seems to me to be bordering on "tallest dwarf" territory, but hmm, wouldn't you think it'd be one of the E's, on the assumption that an innate willingness, nay, eagerness to interact with other people, as, you know, a precursor to having sex with them, would be a key component of sexiness?
And it wouldn't be one of the J's as I generally think of that quality as "punchableness" (um, no offense, Altariel1...;-p).
So it'd be ENTP. Communicator. You hot jelly baby you.
I'm sure it's not all Js. ;-) Possibly punchableness belongs to a subset of Js. But some of them do tend to be a little, oh, inflexible and narrow-minded. Anyway, archbishopm's remark just gave me a giggle, that's all.
Oh, and I forgot to say, thanks for pointing these out. I have an INTP friend who'll now be getting one of these for Christmas; I think she'll be pleased.
Well, at the risk of lapsing into seriousness, I quite like decisive; it's a strength most of the time, and I wish I had it. But I do find it worrying when people - any people - fail to realize that they might be wrong, or at least that some other position might be equally right. In my experience, that seems to happen more often in Js.
That's definitely a strong temptation for the INFJ: it's very easy to take the shortcut of relying completely on my intuition and dismissing others' opinions too quickly, without processing on a more conscious level the judgement I'm making.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
momijizukamori
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 09:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 09:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 09:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 09:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 10:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 11:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 12:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 12:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 12:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 03:58 pm (UTC)And it wouldn't be one of the J's as I generally think of that quality as "punchableness" (um, no offense, Altariel1...;-p).
So it'd be ENTP. Communicator. You hot jelly baby you.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-14 12:58 am (UTC)LOL, but no. I find NT's far more sexy than any of the other types. Boys with actual brains are hot!
And it wouldn't be one of the J's as I generally think of that quality as "punchableness"
Oh, very well said.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 06:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 03:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 03:17 am (UTC)judgmentaldecisive nature of the J ;-Dno subject
Date: 2004-11-17 03:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 03:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-14 02:04 am (UTC)Oh, none taken!
no subject
Date: 2004-11-14 12:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-15 12:34 pm (UTC)I'm bloody offended.
Love the idea but feel the design has missed our typing completely.
Agree about the "boys with brains" thing completely. There is nothing sexier than someone who can lead me from an intelligence point of view.
Of course, given that I have total airhead tendencies sometimes, there are a lot of men who fit that bill!
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 06:04 am (UTC)I go with the "braininess" thing too.