Blue-purple-red
Nov. 5th, 2004 12:07 pmThis graphic shows county by county the US election results. Each county's colour is a mix of three colours (blue for Democrats, red for Republicans, green for other) in proportion to the results for that county. The larger graphic is worth a look too.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 05:13 am (UTC)Still, pretty amazing. I'm in a little blue patch, which I expected; the most interesting thing I guess is the predominance of purple. We run around saying the nation is divided, but the graphic shows this in painful detail. Thanks for the link *forwards*
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 09:06 am (UTC)Eep, I don't know - I just linked to the site after seeing the link somewhere else.
We run around saying the nation is divided, but the graphic shows this in painful detail.
I had a much more optimistic reading: that the US is not so geographically divided as a blue-state/red-state map suggests. All that purple focused me on just how local this makes the issues. That it genuinely is worth being politically involved and debating right down at the grass roots level. Because that might just persuade some people your way, and that might tip the balance of a county, then a state, then an election.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 11:39 am (UTC)Absolutely! Too many people have a bad habit of turning out to vote during the Presidential race, and then entirely forgetting about politics for the next 4 years. In fact, given the federal nature of the US government, many of the most important isues in an American's day-to-day life are actually decided at the state and local levels. (Such as, for instance, what type of setup to use for recording votes.) And at those levels, a single individual's efforts can make an enormous difference. And activities at the state and local levels eventually exert an influence at the federal level.
REAL change begins from the bottom and works its way up, not the other way around.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 01:39 pm (UTC)This is very true. In Minnesota, for instance, the Democrats (DFL - Democratic-Farmer-Labor) won back 13 state house seats, so the Republicans have a majority of only two. Suddenly possible anti-gay marriage initiatives, and the like, were removed from center stage, since there is no way they could go through.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 06:24 am (UTC)Blue in the UK is consevative, right? It must be odd to see the colo(u)rs switched.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 09:08 am (UTC)Very odd. I have to do a translation, every time I look at the colours. Just like when I'm in the US and trying to cross the road. My instinct keeps on trying to turn my head one way, and my intellect has to keep yelling, "No, that way lies death!"
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 11:14 am (UTC)Hee! As you may know, the colors are purely an artefact of American TV news: on election night Democratic states appear in blue and Republican states in red. It makes for a very patriotic picture, because those are the colors of the flag, but the question naturally arises of how the networks decided which color to use for whom, and why they all made the same decision. I have a theory about that: in the US "red" for a very long time has been a nasty slur for "communist," and the Democratic party has been accused by its most vociferous opponents of leaning in that direction. If the TV networks designated Democratic states as red, that would inevitably be taken as political commentary. Calling Republicans "red" just wouldn't get processed in that same polemical way.
So: I'm blue, my state is blue, my city is blue, and my country -- oh, dear. Well, multi-colored at the local level, as you've pointed out. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-06 04:37 am (UTC)Ah! No, I didn't know that. Here the parties are identified with colours, of course. Your theory is interesting and plausible, I think.
So: I'm blue, my state is blue, my city is blue, and my country -- oh, dear.
I have not yet voted in an election in which the party I've voted for has formed the government.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 06:42 am (UTC)My state, New York, went to the Democrats and was never in doubt, but even the areas of high population density are purple. And I expected that. There are no patches of intense blue. A blue state we are, but with a Republican governor and a Republican-dominated state senate. My home town's government is entirely Republican. The parties mean different things on the local levels. And even NY City has a Republican mayor.
I would find it inspiring if I weren't so heavily emotionally invested in it.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 09:20 am (UTC)I would find it inspiring if I weren't so heavily emotionally invested in it.
It's still very early days.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 09:41 am (UTC)But the fact that so many people cannot engage in debate, only fights; cannot imagine another point of view, cannot accept other viewpoints; are convinced that the opposition is invalid; will not apply reason to the issue?
Not so hopeful.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-08 08:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 08:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 09:11 am (UTC)O Canada, we stand on guard for thee..."
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 11:39 am (UTC)"Thy valour steeped in faith
Will protect our homes and our rights..."
(http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/cpsc-ccsp/sc-cs/anthem_e.cfm#a8)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-06 12:04 am (UTC)"It is traditional for civilian men to take off their hats during the playing of the national anthem. Women as well as children do not remove their hats on such occasions."
no subject
Date: 2004-11-06 03:57 am (UTC)While showing how a state-vs-state view is too simplistic, it does seem to point up the perceived division between the cities and the breadbaskets - or perhaps that's just my lousy geography.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-06 04:34 am (UTC)Like those maps of the UK with a blue East Anglia with red dots at Norwich and Cambridge.
I was surprised to see the purple, for example, in the area around New York. Although I think that might be an effect of so many counties crowded up together.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-06 12:52 pm (UTC)To go along with that...
Date: 2004-11-07 08:18 am (UTC)There is indeed a specter haunting America: the old Civil War ghost that shall never be exorcised until the history of racism is read with as much fervor as the Gospel of John. W. Rivers Pitt also put Bush in the category of crazy presidents, in the select company of Jefferson Davis.
Re: To go along with that...
Date: 2004-11-08 12:59 am (UTC)Re: To go along with that...
Date: 2004-11-08 07:02 am (UTC)http://www.commondreams.org/views04/1106-25.htm
Re: To go along with that...
Date: 2004-11-08 07:42 am (UTC)Another distribution map
Date: 2004-11-07 08:05 am (UTC)http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/
Re: Another distribution map
Date: 2004-11-08 01:01 am (UTC)