'The Independent' published a list of 40 life-changing novels every woman should read, based on a survey of 400 literati and the usual media suspects.
Jeanette Winterson is the most represented author; it's pleasing to see Hitchhikers and LotR make the list, although a shame there's not more feminist SF (The Handmaid's Tale is there, though). I'm glad to see A Little Princess rather than The Secret Garden. I have no idea why The Catcher in the Rye and The Corrections are there. Also I'm not sure why these are books every woman should read rather than just, you know, books.
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams
Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen
Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad
The Corrections, Jonathan Franzen
The Rainbow, DH Lawrence
One Hundred Years of Solitude, Gabriel Garcia Márquez
The Catcher in the Rye, JD Salinger
The House of Mirth, Edith Wharton
Little Women, Louisa May Alcott
Jane Eyre, Charlotte Brontë
Middlemarch, George Eliot
Catch 22, Joseph Heller
To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee
Rebecca, Daphne du Maurier
Frankenstein, Mary Shelley
Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit, Jeanette Winterson
I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, Maya Angelou
Villette, Charlotte Brontë
The Mill on the Floss, George Eliot
The Little Princess, Frances Hodgson Burnett
The Golden Notebook, Doris Lessing
Gone with the Wind, Margaret Mitchell
The Secret History, Donna Tartt
The Passion, Jeanette Winterson
The Handmaid's Tale, Margaret Atwood
Wuthering Heights, Emily Brontë
The Great Gatsby, F Scott Fitzgerald
Ulysses, James Joyce
The Grass is Singing, Doris Lessing
Beloved, Toni Morrison
The Lord of the Rings, JRR Tolkien
The PowerBook, Jeanette Winterson
Persuasion, Jane Austen
The Stranger, Albert Camus
Madame Bovary, Gustave Flaubert
Trumpet, Jackie Kay
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, CS Lewis
Remembrance of Things Past, Marcel Proust
Anna Karenina, Leo Tolstoy
Mrs Dalloway, Virginia Woolf
Jeanette Winterson is the most represented author; it's pleasing to see Hitchhikers and LotR make the list, although a shame there's not more feminist SF (The Handmaid's Tale is there, though). I'm glad to see A Little Princess rather than The Secret Garden. I have no idea why The Catcher in the Rye and The Corrections are there. Also I'm not sure why these are books every woman should read rather than just, you know, books.
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams
Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen
Heart of Darkness, Joseph Conrad
The Corrections, Jonathan Franzen
The Rainbow, DH Lawrence
One Hundred Years of Solitude, Gabriel Garcia Márquez
The Catcher in the Rye, JD Salinger
The House of Mirth, Edith Wharton
Little Women, Louisa May Alcott
Jane Eyre, Charlotte Brontë
Middlemarch, George Eliot
Catch 22, Joseph Heller
To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee
Rebecca, Daphne du Maurier
Frankenstein, Mary Shelley
Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit, Jeanette Winterson
I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, Maya Angelou
Villette, Charlotte Brontë
The Mill on the Floss, George Eliot
The Little Princess, Frances Hodgson Burnett
The Golden Notebook, Doris Lessing
Gone with the Wind, Margaret Mitchell
The Secret History, Donna Tartt
The Passion, Jeanette Winterson
The Handmaid's Tale, Margaret Atwood
Wuthering Heights, Emily Brontë
The Great Gatsby, F Scott Fitzgerald
Ulysses, James Joyce
The Grass is Singing, Doris Lessing
Beloved, Toni Morrison
The Lord of the Rings, JRR Tolkien
The PowerBook, Jeanette Winterson
Persuasion, Jane Austen
The Stranger, Albert Camus
Madame Bovary, Gustave Flaubert
Trumpet, Jackie Kay
The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, CS Lewis
Remembrance of Things Past, Marcel Proust
Anna Karenina, Leo Tolstoy
Mrs Dalloway, Virginia Woolf
no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 04:15 pm (UTC)Because if you just call them books, no one will read them?
There are some decidedly odd choices on that list. Gone with the Wind is a life-changing book?
no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 04:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-16 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-17 11:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-15 06:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-16 03:32 pm (UTC)Heh, fair point.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 04:16 pm (UTC)They were concentrating on the shortlist of six (which I think they said effectively meant 20-plus votes from the 400) - from memory, I think Jane Eyre, Wuthering Heights, Pride and Prejudice, Middlemarch, The Handmaid's Tale and Beloved.
I'm struggling to think of a book that's actually changed my life (unless you count Wisden). The closest I could think of was Mary Renault's The Last of the Wine, but I don't think that changed my life, just opened things out a bit. Probably this just reflects how little I have read since I was a teenager - an unfortunate side-effect of doing a literature-based degree, the last thing I wanted to do for relaxation was read more literature. I had another brief burst in the late 1980s, but now reading's just one of those things I'll get around to again when I retire. I get through a couple of books during the slack time at work in the spring, and that's about it.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-21 12:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 04:41 pm (UTC)I am not to be trusted.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-21 11:59 am (UTC)Not to be trusted at this end either.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-16 03:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-16 03:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-16 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-17 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-18 12:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 07:12 pm (UTC)Because they were only asking women; while a number of those books would only appeal to women, there are also others which basically touch common humanity.
I was rather annoyed that the article dismissed the presence of "The Lord of the Rings" due to the films -- gah! Why must they be so predjudiced? For me, personally, LOTR wasn't just great because it was huge vivid epic fantasy, but because it gave me pictures of perseverence against impossible odds, of loyal friendships, of noble kingship, and the corruption of evil.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-16 03:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-21 11:58 am (UTC)I wish there had been some Le Guin there somewhere.
Do you know this community, for feminist SF:
no subject
Date: 2004-09-21 05:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-21 11:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 11:02 pm (UTC)And if by adulthood you haven't read the Alcott, the Lewis and the Burnett, there ain't much point in doing it; they weren't really meant to be first encountered by adults.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-14 11:14 pm (UTC)I'd agree that it decreases one's chances of liking them, but it isn't impossible: I first encountered the Burnett as an adult. But one does have to make allowances for the intended audience.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-16 03:39 pm (UTC)I can still read children's books and enjoy them as much (more often, usually) than many 'grown-up' books. Skellig is one of my books of the year so far. It's hard to imagine not having read the Burnett. I could imagine finding the Alcott irritating as an adult (like the later 'What Katy Did...' books that I've been reading for the first time recently).
no subject
Date: 2004-09-15 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-16 03:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-15 05:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-21 12:11 pm (UTC)