Date: 2011-03-29 02:37 pm (UTC)
I'm genuinely struggling to see what this system offers over FPTP.

I'm not normally so egotistical as to go around quoting myself, but I really can't do much better than:

1. AV is essentially automatic tactical voting: if your preferred candidate genuinely cannot win this election, then your vote is automatically shifted to your next preference, and so on. It allows a voter to accurately express their preferences without risking wasting their vote.

2. AV does make safe seats less common. This is an important part of reducing the power of political parties (as they are less able to parachute favoured candidates into safe seats) and makes individual MPs more readily held to account.

That's what AV offers over FPTP. Wasted votes and an overabundance of safe seats are two problems that arise under FPTP when there are more than two candidates per seat. AV fixes those two problems. With the trend in recent decades away from effectively two-party politics, fixing these problems is timely.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

altariel: (Default)
altariel

September 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 28th, 2025 03:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios