Chuffed to bits with this review of The Never-Ending Sacrifice. For many reasons, but it's particularly nice to hear it described as "a good science fiction novel". Because we try very hard.
That was a damn fine book and I loved it for all the reasons that reviewer gave. You do some damn fine work and I'm glad to see it repeated in public often.
eta: ...I am sick today which is why I'm repeating myself inanely in comments. Also that blog is awesome.
ETA II: NO WAIT. I AM REPEATING MYSELF AS A CONSCIOUSLY SLY COMMENT ON THE CONCEPT OF THE REPETITIVE EPIC. THAT'S MY EXCUSE AND I'M STICKING TO IT.
That's great! Congratulations. I'm glad you give the Cardassians a bit of a break, I found the Bajorans pretty effing tedious with their maquis and their earrings and endless civil wars.
My favourite Star Trek conversation is as follows:
FERENGI COMMANDER (to Worf): We have a meeting.v Go and get the chairs! PICARD: (affronted) Mr Worf is my senior security officer. FERENGI COMMANDER: Well, who gets the chairs?
They never bloody well answered that question either. I think it's the one great flaw of TNG. Everyone was so enlightened and post colonial and post gender and race etc. but SOMEBODY has to get the chairs. The Ferengi commander was spot-on.
Yay! I enjoyed it myself despite never having watched TNG, and it holds together as a novel entirely in its own right I think, but reading a review like that does reinforce the awareness I had even as I read it that I must be missing lots of layers.
It is so satisfying as a writer (published or not) when a reader just completely *gets* something you wrote, isn't it?
Never having followed the series (my loss, I know, which I hope to correct one day) I can't really say more than that. Oh, except that I love the picture at the top of that blog. :)
That's such a cheerful and enthusiastic review. Question: Is it possible to read the book for someone who doesn't know too much about the story universe behind it?
The reviewer is clearly a woman of great taste and insight. And gosh, when I have time, I should read the book again, because all that very good stuff on the Cardassian dissident movement is so topical...
no subject
eta: ...I am sick today which is why I'm repeating myself inanely in comments. Also that blog is awesome.
ETA II: NO WAIT. I AM REPEATING MYSELF AS A CONSCIOUSLY SLY COMMENT ON THE CONCEPT OF THE REPETITIVE EPIC. THAT'S MY EXCUSE AND I'M STICKING TO IT.
(no subject)
no subject
My favourite Star Trek conversation is as follows:
FERENGI COMMANDER (to Worf): We have a meeting.v Go and get the chairs!
PICARD: (affronted) Mr Worf is my senior security officer.
FERENGI COMMANDER: Well, who gets the chairs?
They never bloody well answered that question either. I think it's the one great flaw of TNG. Everyone was so enlightened and post colonial and post gender and race etc. but SOMEBODY has to get the chairs. The Ferengi commander was spot-on.
(Who DOES get the chairs, anyway?)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
It is so satisfying as a writer (published or not) when a reader just completely *gets* something you wrote, isn't it?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
It's a delightful review, and wonderful that the reader got it exactly.
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Never having followed the series (my loss, I know, which I hope to correct one day) I can't really say more than that. Oh, except that I love the picture at the top of that blog. :)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
Because she's a bloody brilliant writer...?
Brava, my dear. Well deserved, no doubt.
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(btw, am very fond of your Tolkien fics--mind if I add you to my "friends" list? :) )
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)