altariel: (Default)
altariel ([personal profile] altariel) wrote2005-04-28 11:02 am

Why I won't be voting tactically

Meanwhile, in the present, the rough beast of the election slouches on - apparently the fate of the nation lies solely in the hands of a few lunatic tactical voters in Royston Vasey, or perhaps it was a Daschund called Colin, I forget now. Every other piece of political propaganda popping through my letterbox earnestly exhorts me to cast a tactical vote in order to keep out whoever.

Back, back, ye demons of cynicism! I shall not make my already meagre contribution to democracy even more pointless! I shall cast a vote that roughly approximates to my beliefs! The BBC as ever provides: here I may compare and contrast the relative merits of arsenic, strychnine, and hemlock. And on May 5th I shall take my poison, secure in the knowledge that I may have only cried out in the wilderness, but at least it was for something I nearly believe in.
ext_6322: (Dr Eccleston)

[identity profile] kalypso-v.livejournal.com 2005-04-28 01:31 pm (UTC)(link)
I've actually been surprised when canvassing that if anything there seem to be fewer people than usual saying that they won't vote. I assume that some of them are lying, and that many of the undecided will not decide, but usually I get some people firmly stating that they definitely won't vote, and off the top of my head I remember only one this time. I'm hoping it might mean the apathetic are slightly less apathetic than the media make out.